KenzoSchnizzle A2 Film Studies

Another excellent Edublogs.org weblog

Fight Club review

Posted in Uncategorized on 01/03/2010 by kenzoschnizzle

Fight Club (1999) is an American film adapted from the 1996 novel of the same name by Chuck Palahniuk. The film was directed by David Fincher and stars Edward Norton, Brad Pitt and Helena Bonham Carter. Norton plays the unnamed protagonist, an “everyman” who is discontented with his white-collar job in American society. He forms a “fight club” with soap salesman Tyler Durden, played by Pitt, and becomes embroiled in a relationship with him and a dissolute woman, Marla Singer, played by Carter.

Greeted with an overall mixed response from movie critics and viewers, Fight Club is still considered as one of the most controversial films ever made and somewhat underperformed at the box office; was made on a budget of $63 million but only grossed $100 million worldwide.

When I walked out of the screening, I turned out disliking the concept of the film and thought to myself, “Firstly, why did there even need to be a ‘fight club’? Secondly, why are the first and second rules stated the same: ‘You don’t talk about Fight Club!’?” Whilst already realising that the film was teaching us an important lesson throughout about twisted humanity and its forthcoming consequences, I felt that the concept of fighting people, for no reason whatsoever, was entirely pointless. However, despite the first and second rules being highlighted, the members would’ve known that they probably shouldn’t talk about Fight Club; on the other hand, Brad Pitt’s character, Tyler, felt that this is a club that no one must know about.

The film and the storyline themselves were extremely edgy, violent and dark. Both the unnamed man and Marla were complete ‘emos’ and Tyler is portrayed as a twisted, ruthless prat who thinks it’s clever to put on a fight club in the first place. On the other hand, the things I was most impressed with were the different aspects of micro-techniques. For instance, the quick cutting from shot to shot within the relationship between the unnamed man and Marla made the film free flowing and the darkened camera lenses (particularly in the car park scenes where the man is invited to the fight club) increased the tension which was good. The last scene was weird: the man shooting himself whereas he actually shot Tyler in the throat(!) and now that he’s gone, the man doesn’t have to live with the horrors of being like Tyler any longer and as established in the final shot, the man and Marla are now together despite the buildings blowing to smithereens as part of Fight Club’s plan called “Project Mayhem”.

A very dark, tense, horrifying masterpiece with extremely depressing character; the film teaches a very important lesson in people’s lives about twisted humanity, following into someone’s bad shoes, etc. Whilst this was certainly no perfect project, this film deserves 7/8 stars out of 10.

Chungking Express review

Posted in Uncategorized on 25/01/2010 by kenzoschnizzle

Chungking Express (1994) is a Hong Kong (Chinese) film and consists of two stories told in sequence, each about a Hong Kong cop and his relationship with a woman. The first story stars Takeshi Kaneshiro and Brigitte Lin and the second stars Tony Leung, Faye Wong and Valerie Chow.

This film was probably one of the least impressive foreign films I’ve seen in aid for the FM4 exam. Whilst it portrayed the Chinese culture with great detail therefore making it one of the best foreign films of all time, it was actually less dark than all the other foreign films I’ve had to watch hence symbolising a slight lack of accuracy. One of the most effective sequences that I found was when Cop 223 attempts to chat up as many girls as possible on a telephone for a date without much success. He finally finds the girls that he is willing to talk to in a pub, the girl turns out as someone who was trying to hide her identity. There, I had learnt that usually, in Chinese culture, because certain people had a lonely background, they would be willing to hide it from others around them, like the latter scene showed. Another thing I enjoyed abut the film was that the main song from the soundtrack “California Dreamin’” by The Mamas & The Papas rung through my ears for a long time; it was a brilliant, catchy song.

A feel-good film although the plot was a bit stale, I rate Chungking Express a 5 out of 10.

Tsotsi review

Posted in Uncategorized on 24/11/2009 by kenzoschnizzle

Tsotsi (2005) is a South African film and tells the story of the title character, a young street thug who steals a car only to discover a baby in the back seat. First time I saw this film, I’ve had mixed emotions towards it: I felt that the dimmed cinematography and the tense background (sound) put some great effect in the majority of the scenes. However, I felt that the story itself was a bit stale; it only really told several days of a young street thug’s life: he stabbed someone in a train, he threatened to shoot a handicapped person and he kidnapped a baby from a car before realising his wrongdoing; before he returns the baby to his rightful family, he gets pursued by the police for his earlier offence. The film then just ends with a fade-out when he keeps his hands poised up. An odd ending!

As much as the film kept me tense throughout, the title character [Tsotsi] made me cringe and he encouraged me to hate him but then, as the film progressed, he made feel sympathy for him because of his troubled background, which was effectively shown in the flashback where his father treated him harshly and shot his dog in the back. It gave a brief idea of how life looked in South Africa; however, it only focused on it basing around one person. It thereby made quite a stale plot with a lack of other characters.

A good, but not great, film; it kept me tense throughout although it lacked any great details of South Africa’s culture. It deserves only an average rating; on a scale of 1-10, I’d rate this film a 5/6.

City of God review

Posted in Uncategorized on 23/11/2009 by kenzoschnizzle

City of God (2002) is a Brizilian crime drama film that depicts the growth of organized crime in the “Rio de Janeiro” suburb of “Cidade de Deus”, between the end of the ’60s and the beginning of the ’80s, with the closure of the film depicting the war between the drug dealer and criminal Knockout Ned. The tagline is “Fight and you’ll never survive….. Run and you’ll never escape.”

Nominated for four Academy Awards for Best Director, Best Adapted Screenplay, Best Cinematography & Best Film Editing, the film, to me, is arguably the best International film I have seen in aid for the FM4 exam so far. Unlike the three other films I’ve seen (La Haine, Once Were Warriors & Tsotsi), the film was very free-flowing, which gets an audience really engaged with the film. On the other hand, the film also had a very dark plot and tells a very true story of what poverty, power, conflict and wealth can do to those who suffer throughout their lifetime; Li’l Ze, the drug dealer, was a typical example of this. After he gets killed by a young group of criminal wannabe’s at the end of the film, this threw me a bit but I then got to understand that the message there was: within cultures, no matter how bad crime develops, the gang cycle would go on and on and on.

An excellently presented film; as a culturally relevant film, it was very dark but the cinematography made City of God an admirable film to enjoy in a tense way! On a scale of 1-10, the film would have to be a 10!

Film Studies coursework: Small Scale Research project

Posted in Uncategorized on 11/11/2009 by kenzoschnizzle

For this research project, my title is: ‘How does the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre make Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy (2004), Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story (2004) and Stepbrothers (2008) memorable films to enjoy?’ As said in the title, my focus film will be Anchorman and I will also be gathering information from the two related films Dodgeball and Stepbrothers.

Annotated Catalogue

Films/DVDs

Item 1: Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy (Dreamworks, US 2004, Dir: Adam McKay): This film would be useful as it shows all of the elements of the typical tongue-in-cheek comedy genre; with a huge influence of Monty Python, it contains a range of comic actors like Will Ferrell, Steve Carell, Christina Applegate and Vince Vaughn with some memorable, off-the-wall quotes with some very funny moments. It portrays a tongue-in-cheek take on the culture of the 1970s, particularly with the then-fresh TV Actions News format.

Item 2: Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story (20th Century Fox, US 2004, Dir: Rawson Marshall Thurber): This film takes on some elements of the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre although while Anchorman is witty, Dodgeball portrays the style of comedy using more slapstick with a more proper storyline. It humorously portrays how an amateur dodgeball team (the Average Joe’s) rose to fame before overcoming the kings of dodgeball (Globo-Gym).

Item 3: Stepbrothers (Columbia, US 2008, Dir: Adam McKay): We see the return of writing duo Will Ferrell and Adam McKay (the writers of Anchorman) joined with colleague John C. Reilly and this film portrays the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre with a combination of wit and slapstick. It tells the story of two 39 & 40-year-old stepbrothers – Brennan Huff (Will Ferrell) and Dale Doback (John C. Reilly) respectively – who, when they first meet, show a dislike of each other; yet in the first third of the film, we see Ferrell & Reilly portray this childish dislike by their trademark silly humour. What else is funny is that these two characters are supposed to be grown-ups when they, themselves are somewhat childish.

Magazines

Item 4: http://www.slantmagazine.com/Film/film_review.asp?ID=3781 This page has proved particularly useful as it contains a full review of Stepbrothers as well as the reviewer commenting on how the film worked in terms of Ferrell and Reilly creating the humour but also criticising where the humour didn’t work. Basically, it is summarising, in terms of Stepbrothers, the pros and cons of the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre.

Box Office

Item 5: http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=anchorman.htm, http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=dodgeball.htm and http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=stepbrothers.htm show the box office statistics of the three chosen films. These helped support the evidence of how popular these films were to certain audiences.

Internet

Item 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-ThOz7G-Ok&feature=PlayList&p=3779FED3F6F04DF0&index=9. This clip contains a wide range of quotes taken from Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy and shows great examples of typical tongue-in-cheek dialogue. For those who haven’t seen the film, once they read these quotes and then seen the film, they would appreciate the enjoyment of seeing Anchorman as a very oddly funny film.

Item 7: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue_in_cheek This page proved useful as it generally summarises the aspects of tongue-in-cheek genre. This would make one spot the ways and various different scenes in which Anchorman, Dodgeball & Stepbrothers suitably fit within the genre.

Item 8: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_humour This page describes the concept of Jewish humour. Even though the page goes on to too much detail about Jewish jokes around religion and ethnicity, it also briefly explains how it largely refers to self-deprecation, a concept within many Jewish American actors and comedians.

Item 9: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-deprecation As a following link from the Jewish humour Wiki page, this page has been very useful because it fully explains the self-deprecation phrase as well as the style of humour and a list of good examples including perhaps the main backbone: Rodney Dangerfield. Much of this humour is contained in Anchorman, Stepbrothers and partly in Dodgeball.

Item 10: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FPv2toi5og This Internet page contains a video clip featuring Jewish American stand-up comedian Rodney Dangerfield. This has proved useful because Dangerfield had become the backbone of self-deprecating humour with his famous catchphrase “I get no respect.”

Item 11: http://www.pemfoo.com/michael/Anchorman-Poster.jpg This is the poster of Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy and this was useful because it shows a typical tagline for a comedy film which, in this case, reads: “They bring you the news; so you don’t have to get it yourself.”

Item 12: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/will-ferrell-hollywoods-highest-paid-star-443160.html This item contains information on how Will Ferrell – the lead actor in Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy and Stepbrothers – rose to fame with his tongue-in-cheek humour which describes his comic role in the film Anchorman. It hardly really talks about the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre itself; although it does discuss how Will Ferrell developed this movement due to his cheesy, yet silly, unattractive, self-deprecating roles, which affectively began his rise to fame.

MATERIAL NOT SELECTED

With this magazine article http://www.totalfilm.com/reviews/cinema/dodgeball-a-true-underdog-story, this describes briefly the containment of the tongue-in-cheek comedy in Dodgeball; although it only briefly describes the humour in the concluding paragraph and even that doesn’t explain much about the genre of the film. The Philadelphia magazine article http://www.phillymag.com/articles/exit_interview_adam_mckay/page3 contained an interview with Adam McKay but was practically useless as it doesn’t give any relevant references towards McKay’s directing style, let alone any of his influences with Will Ferrell to develop the tongue-in-cheek genre. http://www.shalomdelaware.org/page.aspx?id=206732 gives out general info on the success of Jewish humour but hardly explains how it influenced Jewish American comedians.

Presentation Script

How does the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre make Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy (2004), Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story (2004) and Stepbrothers (2008) memorable films to enjoy? 

RUN AUDIO & VIDEO CLIP: Opening two minutes of Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy; Ron Burgundy is doing his humorous take on his vocal warm-up before reading the news; also includes the introduction of the Channel 4 News team (4 mins approx) (Item 1).

PRESENTER: My presentation focuses on the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre and, in particular, how the genre has been so successful over the world enjoyed by many different audiences. Three films central to this examination that I will make reference to throughout this presentation are Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy (Item 1), Dodgeball: a True Underdog Story (Item 2) & Stepbrothers (Item 3).

VIDEO CLIP: Best of Anchorman, length 7’40”, found on YouTube. This clip contains some of the best bits of Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy. It contains some of the funniest quotes in the film and it gives great examples of allegedly serious, tense scenes which end up being broken by the odd quote, usually spoken by, or revolving around, the mentally-challenged Brick Tamland, played by comedian Steve Carell. It also shows a glimpse of the silly, yet cheesy, fight scene between the Channel 4 and Channel 9 Evening News teams. This clip shows the essential elements of humour in the tongue-in-cheek genre (Item 6)

PRESENTER: In this presentation, I will cover:

  • The history of tongue-in-cheek and its development;
  • Certain elements that categorised my three chosen films, including the meaning of tongue-in-cheek, how Jewish humour leading to self-deprecation is involved;
  • How the tongue-in-cheek genre doesn’t work sometimes in Stepbrothers (as shown in Item 4);
  • The success behind Will Ferrell, a key figure in this genre.

PROJECTOR: Several pages via ‘Box Office Mojo’ featuring box office statistics of Anchorman, Dodgeball and Stepbrothers (Item 5)

PRESENTER: So as you could decipher from this extract, average review ratings had suggested that Anchorman, Dodgeball and Stepbrothers had all been generally well received, getting B grades overall. However, Anchorman was the lowest-grossing film, grossing only at over $90million but Dodgeball grossed around $160million. This is mainly due to the fact that the genre had adapted during the four years within the three films.

PROJECTOR: Page on Wikipedia entitled “Tongue-in-cheek” (Item 7)

PRESENTER: Over the years, the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre has developed; it all started in 1828 in The Fair Maid of Perth by Sir Walter Scott, “The fellow who gave this all-hail thrust his tongue in his cheek to some scapegraces like himself.” Tongue-in-cheek is a type of humour in which a statement or a piece of fiction is not meant to be taken seriously; the sarcasm is subtle. The Monty Python group were considered one of the first acts to take on the genre; other groups beforehand were more significantly under the surreal comedy genre.

            More tongue-in-cheek comedy films were made more recently, including Shaun of the Dead, Ninotchka, True Lies & Hot Fuzz. Because Monty Python gained so much popularity in America, the genre evolved all over the USA and now, the three films Anchorman, Dodgeball and Stepbrothers are considered some of the finest examples of silly, cheesy, tongue-in-cheek comedy films. As you hear from Item 1, it shows the very serious anchorman Ron Burgundy doing his vocal warm-up; bearing in mind he is supposed to be the top man in the business, Will Ferrell is portraying this role in a silly, surreal sort of way so you can tell straightaway that this film is not meant to be taken seriously by the viewers, nor is Ron. In Item 6, the audience see Steve Carell as the hilarious Brick Tamland providing a majority of the entertainment as he, along with many other of the actors towards the film, used influences of Jewish humour.

PROJECTOR: Page on Wikipedia entitled “Jewish humour” (Item 8)

PRESENTER: Many American Jewish actors/comedians starred in such tongue-in-cheek comedy films like; amongst the most famous are Will Ferrell, Vince Vaughn, Steve Carell and Ben Stiller. Jewish humour is largely based around self-deprecation…

VIDEO CLIP: Clip from YouTube featuring Jewish American stand-up comedian Rodney Dangerfield (Item 10)

PRESENTER: Now one of the most pinnacle examples of Jewish humour is stand-up comedian Rodney Dangerfield and his catchphrase “I get no respect” made him a household name due to the fact that what he’s saying supposedly means that he is being challenged badly, the audience love him because he wasn’t trying to push himself or sound pompous.

PROJECTOR: Page on Wikipedia entitled “Self-deprecation” (Item 9)

PRESENTER: Self-deprecation, in a nutshell, means someone saying something bad about him/herself without the insult being projected by someone else. It also is another way of saying ‘taking the micky’ out of yourself. It also relies on the observation of something negative about the person delivering it. Many comedians use self-deprecating humour to avoid seeming arrogant or pompous and to help the audience identify with them. In this way, its use could be seen as an application of the rhetorical concept of ethos.

VIDEO CLIPS: Clips from Stepbrothers: the beginning dinner (length 2 mins approx); Dale and Brennan sleeping in their bedrooms, whispering threats to each other (1 min approx); Brennan and Dale premiere Prestige Worldwide’s first music video (“Boats ‘n Hoes”), filmed on Robert’s boat; the video ends when the boat crashes into the rocks and a furious Robert spanks Brennan upon arriving home (4 mins approx). (Item 3)

PRESENTER: These clips highlight exactly the sort of humour prevalent in the tongue-in-cheek genre. I am going to explain to you how these scenes could be taken seriously but end up being portrayed as obvious elements of sarcasm. In the scene within the meal between the Huffs and the Dobacks, we can see the humour within Brennan and Dale acting like little children despite them being close to 40-year-olds; we can see this by the way Dale attempts to squirt ketchup on his food and replying to his dad, “I like it,” portraying particularly childish behaviour. In another sense, he is indeed portraying self-deprecating humour. Likewise, Will Ferrell supports this humour as he starts crying to an insult from his stepbrother Dale about his singing abilities. Likewise, in the scene where they are whispering threats to each other, they’re supposed to be aggressive towards each other; but alas, both Ferrell and Reilly add humour to the scene with their cheesy quotes like, “YOU DON’T SAY THAT!” “Sssssh; you’ll wake my dad! He’ll get me grounded!” and Ferrell offering the most random threat, “I’ll get a pillowcase, fill it with bars of soap and I’ll beat the s*** outta you!” Here, the humour lies in the fact that they’re supposed to be tough towards each other until they give out silly threats and look ridiculous.

            The scene where Dale and Brennan premiere Prestige Worldwide’s first music video proves another exemplary example of a tongue-in-cheek statement. This scene is humorous because Brennan and Dale quite clearly perform this song very weirdly but take themselves extremely seriously.

            After the rather off-putting video – to the two brothers’ parents to that matter – the four characters arrive home and in what was presumably supposed to be a serious falling out; however, even the dad, Robert Doback (played by Richard Jenkins) provides the comic touch by smacking his son-in-law Brennan Huff in an exaggerated way while Brennan’s pleads are also exaggeratedly funny.

PROJECTOR: A newspaper article from The Independent containing info on Will Ferrell (from Anchorman and Stepbrothers) and his success titled “Will Ferrell: Hollywood’s highest paid star” (Item 12)

PRESENTER: One of the main contributors towards the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre was Will Ferrell. I particularly like the quote at the beginning, in the standfirst, describing Will Ferrell’s roles and his laid-back personality that make him so popular towards audiences. In almost all of the films he has starred in, Will had sustained his self-deprecating style so that he doesn’t try to portray himself as pompous or big-headed, hence leading to him gaining so much success and recognition from audiences.

PROJECTOR: Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy poster with tagline, “They bring you the news…” (Item 11)

PRESENTER: Now, as you can see, this is the poster of Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy along with this tagline “They bring you the news.” This is portraying the tongue-in-cheek statement that for everything anchormen say citizens would believe each single word; in this case, Ron Burgundy is THE man to do it when Will Ferrell is mocking his character’s stupidity.

PROJECTOR: A magazine article from Slant Magazine containing a review of Stepbrothers (Item 4)

PRESENTER: According to this review of Stepbrothers, it was commented that certain scenes of humour didn’t always work. For example, as quoted in the review, “comebacks are delivered too quickly and conversational pauses last a second too long,” and that “some scenes that do [work] would have benefited from a touch more of Anchorman‘s anything-goes fantasyland farce.” This was many due to the fact that Stepbrothers was decided, by Adam McKay, to be directed differently, with more foul-mouthed characters which didn’t happen in Anchorman; for example, in the single bed scene where the two stepbrothers are whispering threats. While they were too many pauses, there were still some hilarious lines.

VIDEO CLIP: Final scene from Dodgeball: a True Underdog Story; the scene featuring the ultimate match between Average Joe’s and Globo Gym (roughly 5-10 minutes long) (Item 2)

PRESENTER: As you could see from that clip, although this big match in Dodgeball between Average Joe’s and Globo Gym would’ve decided the grand champions of Dodgeball, it still followed the tongue-in-cheek conventions closely. For instance, despite a big event showing, the director has decided to keep it sustained as a funny scene from a comedy film; what made this scene funny were the cheesy, lively commentary as well as the exaggerated reaction shots after the players on each team were being hit by the ball. Also, bearing in mind that Ben Stiller’s character is supposed to be tough, he again self-deprecates himself by making his character’s hairstyle look weird as well as the way he dresses. Like Ferrell, Stiller plays a role which does not suit him physically, adding to the humour.

            I hope from my presentation you have learnt the conventions of the tongue-in-cheek style, what techniques are used in this genre and why, in particular, this can help to explain the success of the focus films I have discussed.

Evaluation

My small scale research project has focused on Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy as the focus film with the two related films being Dodgeball: a True Underdog Story and Stepbrothers. This would have been a successful project in various ways; however, it would be unsuccessful in other ways, as well. For example, on the positive scale of things, the genre of tongue-in-cheek comedy within the three films would be fun to present; however, there was a difference of style between the three films. For instance, Anchorman & Stepbrothers had followed the majority of conventions of the typical comedy genre with OTT playfighting and its off-the-wall dialogue and quotes; on the other hand, Dodgeball didn’t follow all of the conventions within the genre. Both Adam McKay’s directed films contained a lack of – or an absurdly funny – plot whereas Dodgeball was quite different. Despite the humour in that film being goofy and absurd, it contained a proper plot with more physical comedy involved. All of the films linked in satisfactorily clearly towards Jewish humour as it contains many influences within the humour in actors like Ben Stiller, Will Ferrell, John C Reilly, etc.

            The material required in aid for the research including the use of books, the Internet, magazines and DVD extras. The book research, in the end, proved to be very useless as there wasn’t any relevant material about any of the comedic actors, directors (particularly Adam McKay) or the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre itself. Magazine articles had proved useful as they handed out reviews of all the films; however, there was the Anchorman review in The Independent’s story ‘Will Ferrell: Hollywood’s highest paid star’ both proving as glitches as it only significantly focused on Will Ferrell and very little about the genre behind the films that he’s starred in. This would prove the same case within DVD extras, too. The Internet has proved the most useful and the easiest way of research as I’d found pages which significantly describes the summary of tongue-in-cheek comedy, which means a fictional work which isn’t meant to be taken seriously although containing subtle sarcasm, coupled with Jewish humour and self-deprecation. After finding a ‘best of’ clip coupled with a Wikiquote page from Anchorman, it has proved to be a backbone to what is required within a tongue-in-cheek comedy; however, like magazine articles, I also found irrelevant pages containing info about either only the film(s) or the star of the film(s).

            In duration of this project, I had developed the skills of researching material and analysing how the material is relevant or irrelevant to the question. Also, I had learnt about discovering the history of the tongue-in-cheek genre as well as developing understanding of Jewish humour leading to self-deprecation of the genre. My selection process of the catalogue has revolved around searching for reviews and clips of my chosen films in order to support what makes a funny film.

            In conclusion, even though magazine articles were easy to find on the Internet (in addition to Internet articles) – not helped by the lack of info from books – I had learnt that although the pages I found for research may’ve been too predictable, it would’ve been difficult to produce information about the genre from fanpages like Will Ferrell’s fanpage – let alone films’ reviews – apart from Wikipedia; info would also be limited on IMDB so therefore, the presentation script would’ve been a bit shallow. Anchorman and Stepbrothers was quite different to Dodgeball in terms of comedy style, hence leading to a difficulty of spotting similarities the films. However, after researching Jewish humour, I found that there would’ve been more to relate to within my three chosen films.

Once Were Warriors review

Posted in Uncategorized on 01/10/2009 by kenzoschnizzle

Once Were Warriors (1994) is a New Zealand film and tells the story of an urban Maori family, the Hekes, and their problems with poverty, alcoholism and domestic violence, mostly brought on by the family patriarch Jake Heke. When I watched it, I personally felt that the film was kind of dragging my attention away from it; with a solid storyline containing a consistently dark atmosphere (a regular feature in films with a cultural narrative), it wasn’t a very exciting film. In fact, far from it!

I found the film cruel, depressing, ruthless and violent as well as excessively aggressive but it wasn’t directed that way for nothing. It shows a very true perspective of what poverty can do to someone, if not a family. The rape scene between ’Uncle’ Bully and a 13-year-old was very dark and disturbing but the reason why Lee Tamahori didthis scene was that ‘Uncle’ Bully was living under a deprived part of society. This was what caused the daughter to hang herself because she hated her deprived lifestyle.

A surprisingly good film to watch, it’s certainly not the film to watch whilst scoffing your dinner! A very dark film to keep you tense throughout. On a scale of 1-10, I’d rated this film an 8.

How does the tongue-in-cheek comedy genre make ‘Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy’, ‘Dodgeball: a True Underdog Story’ and ‘Stepbrothers’ memorable films to enjoy?

Posted in Uncategorized on 30/09/2009 by kenzoschnizzle
anchorman1

Focus Film

This title is for a small scale research project which will contain a tongue-in-cheek comedy genre theme, which will focus on Anchorman: the Legend of Ron Burgundy with support from two other films: Dodgeball: a True Underdog Story and Stepbrothers.

La Haine review

Posted in Uncategorized on 24/09/2009 by kenzoschnizzle

La Haine (1995) is a French film about three teenage friends and their struggle to live in the banlieues in Paris. My reaction is mixed towards this film; I liked it because the dark, melancholy atmosphere kept me tense throughout but because the filming itself was in black-and-white lenses, I found it difficult overall to follow the majority of the action.

            However, the only thing I found unfavourable about it was that the whole mood in the play was very much the same throughout which was violent, unpleasant and filled with rebellion. The point I’m trying to get to here is that each film has a beginning, middle and an end with each mood being a bit different per section (usually a factor towards adventure films). On the other hand, a select few films (like this one) seem very different; they have a very solid storyline like this one, very much like the British New Wave films which, like foreign films like La Haine, focus mainly on the cultural and social context of the film.

            Not a brilliantly exciting film; on a scale of 1-10 (1 being very poor and 10 being excellent), I would rate this film a 4.